Fiscal irresponsibility: If no one notices the problem, is it really a problem?

It’s a legitimate question, at this point. Time will tell if the math ultimately gives out, or if the “dismal science” of economics can continue to live up to its name in defying expectations.

Maybe it’s just another example of economic moral relativity?

If you strive to live in a world where individual responsibility is a virtue, then we might just have a problem here, folks.

If not, then who are we to judge? Only history will be able to do that.

American Institute for Economic Research: A Fate Worse than Hyperinflation

https://www.aier.org/article/a-fate-worse-than-hyperinflation/

“…easy money generates risk free profits for banks and growing federal deficits. Worst of all, the public is unaware.”

“The political system has developed a formula over the last decade that has only pushed in the direction of further fiscal irresponsibility. Fiscal expansion is not followed by higher taxes or a period of fiscal constraint. It is supported by a central bank that has become increasingly effective at hiding the detrimental effects of this policy.

The pain that will accompany a shift toward responsible behavior, whether adopted voluntarily or involuntarily in the case of a day of reckoning, is only increasing.”

“A lack of awareness of the dangers faced in this game by both the public and by politicians leaves the audience of public opinion in a collective yawn in response to discussion of fiscal responsibility.”

Tagged : / /

Another case of privatized gains, socialized losses?

We’re all for keeping the little guys afloat. And whatever you think of the private-equity model in the first place, and what it means for “short-term bottom-line impact vs. long-term growth and workers” (perhaps a discussion for another day) it might all be fine until you read that last part…

(Hint: It’s Risk/Reward – until you take all the risk away from those who stand to get the greatest rewards)

(Another Hint: As long as the wealthy get to stay wealthy first and foremost, then some folks might be willing to help keep the little guys afloat)

SFGate: Behind the scenes, private equity angles for a piece of stimulus

https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Behind-the-scenes-private-equity-angles-for-a-15182768.php

“…the private-equity model often leads to more unemployed workers because firms are focused on ruthless efficiency and the investors’ bottom line, rather than long-term growth and workers.”

“Currently, most small companies in a private-equity firm’s portfolio don’t qualify for stimulus funds provided through the Small Business Administration under what is known as the “affiliation rule.” Businesses must report if they have major investors, and they are blocked from the program on the theory that they can borrow money from their larger and deep-pocketed private-equity backers, rather than taxpayers.

Tagged : / /

Maybe those old savers were on to something?

To be fair to the young adults, our policies, what with QE, ZIRP, NIRP, no-money-down-mortgages, asset price inflation, bailouts, soaring college costs, identity politics, everyones-entitled-to-a-free-lunch (but especially Wall Street), etc… kind of made debt seem “cool” over the past few decades. Wonder where they got it from? At least they’re starting to question it now…

NY Times: Young Adults, Burdened With Debt, Are Now Facing an Economic Crisis

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/06/business/millennials-economic-crisis-virus.html

“You compare it to the older generations — they worked up and saved money,”

Bad Behavior = Benefits & Bailouts?

Stamford Advocate: U.S. airlines want a $50 billion bailout. They spent $45 billion buying back their stock.

https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/business/article/U-S-airlines-want-a-50-billion-bailout-They-15182769.php

“But what I am saying is that the terms of the bailout money that the airlines get from us should reflect the fact that a substantial part of their current financial problem is of their own making.”

“But it’s a point that we should keep in mind every time we see companies line up at the bailout trough. If many of these companies hadn’t spent lots of money to buy back their own stock to prop up its price, they wouldn’t need anywhere near as much money as they need now. “

“The main reason companies buy back stock in the market, of course, is to support their share price. High stock prices not only make shareholders happy but also increase top executives’ wealth by making their shareholdings and stock-purchase options more valuable.”

“In addition, in many cases higher share prices help trigger higher executive compensation because share price is one of the metrics that corporate boards often use to determine executives’ compensation packages.”

Tagged : /